
* There seems to be a growing chorus of discontent from writers and poets who feel they are getting a raw deal from both online and small press publishers who are playing hard and fast with their IP rights. The worst example we have encountered is an online site that demanded a poet seek written permission to use one of her own poems – despite the fact she was unaware she had even submitted any of her work to the site for publication.
Hey, publishers – its called piracy. You are all very quick to complain if someone rips of one of your titles – yet you have no qualms about ripping off your own authors. In related developments...
- Ink Sweat & Tears will be republishing its publication guidelines in a separate post – none of the terms have changed but it is probably worth restating them.
- AND, here is a story from Wikipedia you may want to consider... Until recently, the domain name Poetry.com was owned by New Catalyst Fund. On March 7th, 2009, Lulu.com purchased that domain from NCF. Publish Today and Noble House Books, the branches of Poetry.com that managed the publishing and printing of their books, have gone out of business. According to their press release, Lulu has aggressive plans to completely revamp Poetry.com and bring it under the Lulu brand. The site will be renamed to Lulu Poetry, and will be targeted to poets who want to connect with their peers and have access to resources to receive reviews and feedback on their poetry as well as recognition, contest prizes and helping them publish their work.
Poetry.com was previously run by a Maryland-based company called The International Library of Poetry, also known as the International Society of Poets and the International Poetry Hall of Fame. This company was considered by many to be a vanity publisher. Poetry.com claimed to coordinate monthly poetry contests and other services through its website, though the actual competitive nature of these contests was disputed. The site's ostensible primary purpose was publication of poetry anthologies submitted by aspiring authors, and invitations to poetry conventions hosted by the group. The Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland classified the business as a vanity publisher, and notes that the quality of the poetry submitted to them "does not appear to be a significant consideration for selection for publication."
Critics of the International Library of Poetry's business model describe their practices as "deceptive and misleading" in that they misrepresent their activities as a contest based on the quality of poetry submitted, whereas in fact the quality has little or no influence on the outcome. They are also accused of portraying the anthologies they publish as a "real literary credit that poets can be proud of" while simultaneously producing anthologies that are available on special order only and which are full of poor quality poetry. Other critics point out that standard industry practice is for winners of poetry contests to receive gratis copies of any publication of their work, and that ILP fails to follow this protocol.
The Better Business Bureau comments that it has received "hundreds" of complaints concerning ILP, and that it considers their business to be vanity publishing. In 2004, the New York State Consumer Protection Board launched an investigation into ILP, which it said "takes advantage of people both emotionally and financially," but suspended the investigation due to a shortage of complaints.
* Finally, Sarah Hilary has a media column appearing in the current issue of Foto Magazine (Issue 25) entitled A Perspex Crucifix, about a propaganda photograph taken of her family during WWII. We've attached a PDF of the article – also check out: www.foto8.com/home/content/view/814/488/

